Published by parMaster on 15 May 2008

Better Talk To Spock Before Your Friends Do

Internet marketer Jane Copeland expressed some dismay over a people search engine called Spock.com. Essentially, this service allows anyone to set up a profile for anyone else and then the search engine will draw from various sources around the web to include information about you and anyone can go up and add information about you, whether it is true or not. There are several things wrong with this, but rather get into those and harp on things that will take more than a few blog posts to fix, let me suggest a few ways you can use this service as a positive reputation management tool.

First, you should set up your own profile before someone else does. As Jane Copeland says in her blog post, it can be a royal pain to fix inaccurate information once it is published. If you set up your own profile then you can set the pace for the information about you before someone else does. Plus, by including some basic information about you - websites you are connected with (and that includes social networking profiles) and people with whom you are connected - then the service can go from there to add other stuff that it finds about you. That leads me to my next two points:

  1. Be careful what you say about yourself online. Everything you do online is public record. If you’d be embarrassed by it, don’t let it get online. If you think that 20 or 30 years from now something can come back and haunt you, or if it’s something you wouldn’t want your children or grandchildren knowing about you, then don’t let it get online - anywhere. Even in the most private and secure areas of the Net.
  2. Update your Spock.com information periodically. This is not something you have to pore yourself over every day. Who knows if this service will be popular in the future? It could, like many other website concepts, just die. And if so then no bother. But right now, it’s alive and well. As long as it is live, it has potential dangers. From a reputation management perspective, it is better if you go in and update the information than if someone else does. So, once a month or so, just go by and make sure the information is accurate and up to date. If something is no longer true, add a change to the news segment (but pay attention to Rule No. 1 above). You don’t have to tell the world everything about yourself. Just make sure that what you do tell them is accurate and reflects your own sense of self worth and privacy.

Finally, don’t play dirty pool with other people’s online information. That’s bad karma, and besides, if you wouldn’t want them doing it to you then don’t do it to them.

Published by parMaster on 14 May 2008

Enterprise Social Media Interview with Jim Cuene and Douglas Pollei

Tonight interactive gurus from General Mills, Best Buy, Target, Fingerhut and Gage will convene at an event hosted by MIMA to discuss: Duality Reality: Who Controls Social Media in the Enterprise?

As a preview, I reached out to Douglas Pollei (left) of Social Media Club Minneapolis and VP of Internet Strategy and Corporate Development for IKANO Communications who helped get the panel created and panelist Jim Cuene (right), who is Director of Interactive at General Mills. to ask a few questions about tonight’s topic.

This dual interview offers everyman definitions of social media, common challenges in large organizations as well as tips and resources for companies trying to figure out how to get their arms around social media in their organizations. We also have reason for new nicknames: “Twitter Jim” and “Wiki Douglas”. Read on.

MIMA is having an upcoming event about social media in the enterprise, “Dual Reality: Who Controls Social Media in the Enterprise”. How did the event and your involvement with it come about? What are some key topics?

Pollei: The idea for the panel goes back to December when I had a discussion with Ken Kaplan at Intel in San Jose http://kenekaplan.wordpress.com. What he was experiencing is what many who are involved with social media deployment in large companies were up against, the duality reality. Since then I had heard it called by different names. Liz Strauss calls it the gap, Josh Bernoff calls it purists and corporatists, but it is about the bottom up groundswell and the top down control colliding.

Since that early discussion with Ken, I collaborated on the idea of a panel with Jim Cuene at General Mills. He introduced me to Matt Wilson at MIMA who agreed that the topic would be interesting. I figured the event, being co-produced with MIMA and Social Media Club, could help open up the conversation to a more national level. MIMA announced today that this will be the largest monthly event ever held.

Cuene: Doug Pollei and I were talking in January about the social media, how companies like General Mills were going to be changed by it, and how much we had to learn. At the same time, he was looking into starting up a local chapter of the Social Media Club. I though there was a clear synergy with MiMA, suggested he approach MiMA about a joint program. He’s a driver, and he made it happen. I’m happy to be part of it!

How would you define “social media” to someone not fluent in interactive or online marketing?

Cuene: I’m going to rip off Dan Zane’s definition of folk music: Social media is media for social people. Or, a slightly more complicated version: Social media is the online content left by people as a by-product of being social online. It’s the media that results when folks write, review, share, trade, connect, etc. online.

A lot of people define it by the tools: IM, twitter, Facebook, etc. It’s easy to look at the technology that delivers the media - like TV, radio, magazines. But, the key in this model is that the media is more associated with the behavior than with the tools.

Pollei: A online area where people can connect, share, and learn. In the early days of the Internet, this was done by newsgroups, email, or bulletin boards. Now there are large online spaces you can connect like Facebook, Myspace, or LinkedIn. Connections can be on these large sites or it can be in smaller sites as well with persons of likeminded interests. The whole point is to participate (connect and share) and not to be idle on the sidelines.

What are some of the common issues large organizations encounter when trying to evaluate and adopt social media technologies? Are you seeing more internal or external facing applications? (ex: building a private social network vs engaging in existing/public social networks)

Pollei: Social media is great for its potential for honesty and community involvement. This is an opportunity but also a risk. Groups like Marketing, Interactive, Product Management, Strategy, Legal, PR, IT, outside vendors, consultants, and advertising agencies are all part of the mix that must coordinate. All are groups who have a say in the struggle many large organizations are experiencing regarding control over social media.

Forces are oftentimes at odds with each other inside these groups due to top down control and bottom up innovation. So the idea of “control” really should not be part of the conversation inside a large organization. Rather the vocabulary and culture should shift.

I believe IT groups are starting to embrace social tools in their network. Many vendors are now building social tools for their existing software. BEA announced recently a series of social tools with innovators like BDG. In the future, companies will use a mix of private and public tools based upon the needs or their customers, employees, and community.

Cuene: The only stuff I care about right now is consumer facing. I don’t care too much about Enterprise 2.0 (though I know that I need the same tools for internal communications that I’m seeing take off in the consumer space).

The phenomenon is just getting started, even though to those of us who are on Twitter and compulsively reload Tec meme it feels like it’s been around a while. It’s still so early in the game! Big companies that have been historically reliant on mass media are just now beginning to realize the extent to which their worlds will change as a result of social media.

A couple key issues:

  • Efficiency is elusive/It’s hard to execute social media efficiently- Large companies have made a science out of finding efficiencies in media, and have been pretty successful squeezing most of the fat out of production budgets. But, social media, in a lot of ways, is the exact opposite of mass: Labor intensive, highly involved, non-standardized.
  • Who to Turn to - Big companies are critically dependent on their agencies as a way to run lean internally. But 90% of ad agencies are still trying to figure out how to deal with display and SEM. Social media is going to be a total mind- f*** for them. And a lot of the “social media agencies” are making it up everyday, as they go along. No one has this figured out, and big companies aren’t really staffed right to figure it out themselves.
  • Evaluating success - What’s a good result? We all know home runs when we see them in other media, but what does a a successful social media campaign look like? How big does that success have to be to drive the business?
  • Velocity -By it’s nature, social media is slower than Mass. The Blendtec guys were at it for a while, before “Will it Blend” went big. Viral hits like “elf-yourself” don’t just happen overnight in most cases, even if it seems like it to us. Tv-centric companies are used to turning on the ad (or dropping the FSI, or starting the promotion) and seeing the results immediately. For companies that are used to the velocity of impact that comes from “mass” media, the slow, steady approach may be frustrating

For me, the scariest thing is the tension between wanting to move fast on this stuff, and not wanting to make a major commitment too soon. I think the idea of “first move advantage” is mostly bullshit in this space. Maybe it’s because I’m getting older, or because my brands have more to lose, but I’m really getting comfortable with the idea of being the smart follower.

Social media is creating whole new communication patterns, consumers are learning new habits and they’re inventing new ways of taking in information. And the technology to make it all go is literally being invented right now. As an entrepreneur, I’d want to be right in the middle, creating the change. As a marketer, I’m comfortable with the idea of watching things evolve for a while

Can you share a few high level tips for companies that are in discovery mode when it comes to tasks such as deciding on social platforms and applications, internal management and success measurement?

Cuene: I’m an unreliable source here. We’re still sorting out this stuff, but I’ll let you know when I’m confident enough that we’ve been successful. Here are principles we’re working from:

  • Fail fast and small
  • Pull the trigger slowly
  • Manage experimentation like a portfolio. Assume that out of 10 experiments, you’ll get one smash, 2-3 qualified wins, one or two that seem like noble failures, and the rest will probably wash out.

One piece of advice that I would give is, work really closely with the companies. Facebook, Myspace, Google, Yahoo, Cafemom, Videoegg, have all been very willing to work with us to create successes.

Pollei: First you have to find out what kind of participation levels you community is at before you decide on a platform or application. You could potentially invest large dollars in something no one is using yet in the social media adoption curve.

Participate in webinars with many of the social media vendors to see if they have products that meet you community criteria. Awareness Networks is very active in this area of Enterprise 2.0. I would also seek analysts who have performed reviews of social tools. Jeremiah Owyang’s list of White Label Social Media Vendors is a good place to start. Connie Benson, a community manager located here in Minnesota, has helped compile some further questions on these topics at http://dualityreality.pbwiki.com

What are some of the resources (sites, blogs, books, events, networks, applications, etc) that you rely on for information on social media best practices?

Pollei: This is a hard one but I can list what I am currently reading or attending.

Academic Sites:

  • http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/
  • http://blog.hbs.edu/faculty/amcafee/index.php/ - Andrew McAfee@Harvard

Great Thoughts

  • http://www.conversationsmatter.org/
  • http://www.webguild.org/
  • http://iinnovate.blogspot.com/
  • http://avc.blogs.com/
  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com
  • http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/
  • http://www.web-strategist.com

Events:

  • http://upcoming.yahoo.com/group/16/ - This is the master list for what to attend
  • http://conversation.eventbrite.com/
  • I always liked the Cluetrain Manefesto and it will be celebrating the 10 year anniversary at this event with Doc Searls, co-author of “The Cluetrain Manifesto” and fellow at Harvard’s Berkman Institute.
  • http://code.google.com/events/io/ - Google Developer Conference
  • http://smbmsp.ning.com/ Twin Cities Social Media Breakfast – Hosted by Rick Mahn

Books Currently in my Bag: The Big Switch and Groundswell

Cuene: My reading list is much more narrow than both it should be and it used to be. I don’t think I’ve got anything unique to share here…

I asked this question of Charlene Li in a previous interview about Groundswell, so you can’t use her answer (RSS). If you were a social technology, which one would you be?

Cuene: Twitter? Short attention span, limited capabilities, impulsive, compulsive, omnivorous

Pollei: How about being a wiki. It is similar to a “mi casa su casa” attitude. You don’t have to know somebody at the door to get in or have to bribe the bouncer. Simply share your information and thoughts and people will do the same. Collective thoughts and community. It is not about who owns the brand or channel but about problem solving.

READER BONUS! What question should I really be asking you? (and the answer of course)

Cuene: How are you making decisions about where to invest energy and time in social media?

  • Where are you placing your long term bets? (not telling)
  • Is Facebook the next AOL? (yes)
  • Is the web page dead? (Not yet, but it’s dying)
  • What comes after the webpage? (the feed)
  • Is professional, quality content dead? (it’s not nearly as valuable as it used to be)

Thanks guys!

[Be sure to visit Jim's blog where he elaborates on his answers "Questions about Social Media/ Implications for Marketers".]

Meet Jim, Doug and the rest of the panel, Brad Smith, VP of eCommerce & Digital Marketing, Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Gary Koelling, Creative Director, Social Technology, Best Buy, Jason Kleckner, Manager, Information Architecture, Target Corporation, and Moderator: Michael Kraabel, Group Creative Director, Gage this evening at Solera.

Registration is currently only available at the event at 5:15. Space is limited so get there early. Presentations start at 6:00pm. More info on the MIMA site.

Sponsored By: Follow TopRank on Twitter Get daily updates, insights and zero “cat” tweets!

Published by parMaster on 14 May 2008

Turn Your Local Business Website Into A Community Social Network

Social networking is the biggest thing online today. You’ve no doubt heard of Facebook and StumbleUpon. Well, did you know that you can turn you local business website into a community social network using one of two tools that will allow you to do that easily?

Facebook is in the process of rolling out a new application, Facebook Connect, that will allow you to add social networking features to your local website and let your users network with their Facebook friends more easily. Why would you want to do that?

Well, for starters, people will stay on your website longer. And because they stay on your website longer, you’ll be able to charge more advertising on your local website - if you offer advertising. If you are a service site then keeping people on your website longer could benefit you by branding you in their minds. That’s a powerful benefit.

Plus, since Facebook has local networks that make it easier for people in the same community to network and build relationships, this is one cool feature for a local website and it allows you to build community without spending thousands of dollars. It’s free!

The other tool that will allow you to build community into your local website is Google FriendConnect. Google FriendConnect is a bit more flexible than Facebook Connect because you can build interactive features into your website from several social networking communities, not just one. The drawback is that Facebook has better privacy features. But if you want your users to be able to connect through Facebook, Plaxo, hi5, Orkut, or other social networking communities then Google FriendConnect could be the way to go.

Whether you decide to use Google FriendConnect or Facebook Connect, turning your local business website into an online community makes a lot of sense.

Published by parMaster on 13 May 2008

How Many Conferences Can You Attend in 30 Days?

Audience

Conferences are a big part of TopRank’s marketing and content promotion strategy and it looks like a busy summer is ahead of us. Numerous events are coming up quickly - enough to make your head spin. Here is a summary of our involvement with PRSA, DMA, PUSH, SIS, SES and SMX events over the next 30 days:

05/14/08 - MIMA: Duality Reality - Who Controls Social Media in the Enterprise?
The local interactive marketing association along with inspiration and motivation from Doug Pollei, there will be a very interesting panel of in-house Interactives discussing how large companies (General Mills, Best Buy, Target, Fingerhut and OptumHealth) are adopting and measuring social media programs. If you’re in the Twin Cities this week and involved with social marketing now or in the future, this is a MUST ATTEND event.

05/15/08 - Teleseminar: Reputation Management in a Google World
Crisis communications PR pal Kami Watson Huyse and I will be doing this PRSA Teleseminar for PR professionals that are still trying to make sense out of SEO and search engines as PR tools. More info is available on the PRSA web site

05/18/08 - Search Insider Summit
On beautiful Captiva Island in Florida, MediaPost is holding another strategic, networking focused conference with TopRank’s Online Marketing Blog as a media sponsor. The SIS event is hands down one of my favorite conferences. It’s small, exclusive, high level and full of networking with senior agencies and brands. Visit the SIS site for more info.

05/19/08 - ACCM: Reputation Management - Protecting Your Brand in the Search Engines
The DMA is holding it’s annual ACCM conference in Orlando, FL and together with Heather Lloyd-Martin of SuccessWorks and Rob Key of Converseon, we’ll be explaining the intricacies of online reputation management to the direct marketing crowd. More info on the session page.

06/03/08 - SMX Advanced
Of all the SMX conferences I’d like to attend, this is the one I look forward to most. Due to conflicts, Dana Larson from TopRank will be attending and blogging in my place. This SMX event promises high level content for those already fluent in SEM. More info here.

06/09/08 - PRSA Digital Impact Conference: SEO for News Content
For the PRSA I am presenting a session in NYC for PR practitioners on how to make the most of optimizing the digital assets they have access to. Optimizing news content leads to more effective discovery by journalists researching topics/experts online. Find the 2 day conference schedule here.

06/15/08 - PUSH: The Fertile Delta
PUSH is an annual executive conference for innovators on topics including Economics, Religion, Politics and Technology held by the PUSH Institute in Minneapolis. I’ve heard buzz about this event for several years and am now finally going to attend. Here’s more about the PUSH experience.

06/17/08 - SES Toronto: Twitter - Ultimate Time Waster or Great Tool?
Clearly the writer of this session title has some bias. David Snyder of JRDunn, Chris Winfield of 10e20 and myself will effectively clarify what Twitter is good for and what it is not. I will be presenting results of our Twitter survey as well as a case study and 3rd party tools. Session info here.

If you are attending any of these events, be sure to say so in the comments!

For our coverage of conferences ranging from PR to direct marketing to search marketing, visit our Marketing PR Conferences category.

Sponsored By: Reputation Management in a Google World PRSA Teleseminar

Published by parMaster on 13 May 2008

Reputation Management Is Not SEO

Marketing Pilgrim had a great blog post yesterday about the difference between SEO and reputation management. It got me to thinking, which is a bit dangerous at times.

What many companies do, and Jordan McCollum provides enough good examples, when they get into reputation trouble is try to hire an SEO firm to “knock down” negative results about themselves, thinking that this will somehow fix the problem. But it won’t. Usually, those negative results are still there. They just may be a little more difficult to find. But someone intent on finding them will find them nonetheless.

SEO is good; don’t get me wrong. But reputation management is not SEO. They are two different things. SEO is something that you can do only as you are doing it. You can not pre-SEO your website, in other words. As you build your website, you built into it the SEO necessities to help it rank in the search engines. It starts with keyword research.

Reputation management, on the other hand, is something that you can do before you need it. SEO you do as you need it. But your reputation is too important - much too important - to leave to the vagaries of search engine algorithms. Your reputation is a lasting impression and even long after the evidence of negativity has been buried there is still a lingering issue, at least in the mind of the one person who saw fit to blast your name everywhere on the Web, with regard to your reputation. Those negative impressions are hard to erase; not impossible, just difficult.

The time to manage your reputation online is before you need to. Don’t wait for someone to post negative comments about you to start managing your reputation. Do it before you need to and when the time comes to defend it, you’ll be in a much better position to be able to do so.

Next »