Home
Search results “Principles of transnational civil procedure”
What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?
 
07:40
What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean? INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION meaning - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION definition - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries. The main difference between international litigation and domestic litigation is that, in the former, certain issues are more likely to be of significance — such as personal jurisdiction, service of process, evidence from abroad, and enforcement of judgments. Although there are differences among the jurisdictional statutes of many American states, they all are subject to the due process requirements imposed by the Constitution of the United States. As a result, most American lawyers who are familiar with general principles of jurisdiction in one or more states of the US are able to guide their clients through jurisdictional issues in connection with disputes among litigants from different states. The situation is different with respect to jurisdictional principles in the international context. The first difference concerns long-arm jurisdiction, which is the statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over out-of-state defendants. A long-arm statute authorizes a court in a state to exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. Without a long-arm statute, the courts in a state might not have personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. A state's authorization to exercise jurisdiction is limited by the federal Constitution. The use of a long-arm statute is usually considered constitutional where the defendant has certain minimum contacts with the forum state and there has been reasonable notice of the action against that defendant. Second, many countries take the view that American concepts of long-arm jurisdiction are too broad, and courts of such countries will not recognize judgments from American courts based on the exercise of American long-arm jurisdiction. Looking at the issue from the non-American perspective, courts in some countries exercise jurisdiction based upon principles that American courts would consider unfair and repugnant to American law. For example, in some countries, such as England and Israel, a court may exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that is considered to be a "necessary or proper" party in a case against a local defendant. It is not clear that such a jurisdictional basis would be upheld by American courts when the non-US judgment-creditor seeks to enforce in the United States. In every lawsuit, the plaintiff must effect service of process upon the defendant(s). In the international context, the issue of service of process is more complex. In the United States, service of process is routinely carried out by private lawyers or their agents. In contrast, many other countries consider the activity of serving process in a judicial proceeding to be one appropriate only for the government or an arm of the government. As a result of differing approaches to the issue of service of process, several nations signed the Hague Service Convention (1965), under which each member nation is required to establish a Central Authority to receive, review, and execute requests from foreign courts for carrying out service of process. Most countries that are signatories to the Hague Service Convention will accept requests for service that are signed by the lawyer for the plaintiff (claimant). Two exceptions are the UK and Israel. .....
Views: 207 The Audiopedia
Transnational Commercial Law
 
03:49
BOOK REVIEW TRANSNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW International Instruments and Commentary 2nd Edition By Roy Goode, Herbert Kronke, Ewan McKendrick, and Jeffrey Wool ISBN: 978 0 19 958286 0 www.oup.com FOR PRACTITIONERS IN GLOBAL BUSINESS: A WELCOME 2nd EDITION OF 'TRANSNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW'. An appreciation by Phillip Taylor MBE and Elizabeth Taylor of Richmond Green Chambers Business is now global and so too, obviously, is commercial law, which, like the world of business itself, changes continuously. Commercial lawyers virtually everywhere will welcome this new second edition of 'Transnational Commercial Law' recently published by the Oxford University Press. The new edition incorporates and closely examines the numerous and diverse developments in transactional commercial law that have taken place since the publication of the first edition seven years ago. The work as a whole has undergone comprehensive revision to include numerous new international instruments and additional ratifications of existing conventions, so there is much new material. For example, in Chapter 2 the third edition of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts published in 2011 replaces the second edition. In Chapter 3, the 2005 UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Trade has been added. There's an overview of the convention on carriage of goods by sea, road and air in a new Chapter 5... and in Chapter 6, the new codified version of the First Company Directive which deals with agency and distribution, now appears. We could go on, but suffice to say that the list of incorporated new material is formidably lengthy; all the more reason why, if you are professionally involved in commercial law you need the expertise, the scholarship and above all, the authority provided by this book. The structure is logical. For example, introductory text is provided at the beginning of each of the thirteen chapters which cover an incredibly wide range of subject matter, including the various relevant aspects of contract law, from international sales and carriage of goods to agency and distribution... international credit transfers and bank payment undertakings... cross-border insolvency... conflict of laws... international civil procedure and of course, much more. Of particular relevance to just about everyone involved in international trading is the chapter which covers electronic commerce with its 'efficient alternatives to paper-based contracting' as the authors have put it. It seems that, predictably and understandably, the law carries on struggling to keep up with the relentless advance of internet technologies and facilities such as social networking. As the authors trenchantly admit, 'electronic commerce exposes the incompleteness of legal rules applicable with the geographic limits to which technology is impervious.' For practitioners with internet shopping clients, the introductory text here makes for enlightening reading, together with the list of key instruments (UNCITRAL 1996 and 2011), two EC directives and all four chapters on the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts. In our view, this latest edition of this authoritative work, with its wealth of new material and detailed content, is an essential requirement for practitioners within this area of law, as well as those undertaking research. Extensive research resources abound, including copious and detailed footnoting, a lengthy index and extensive tables of cases and of statutes. The publication date is cited as at January 2012.
Views: 993 Phillip Taylor
Sheldon Elsen
 
01:14
Sheldon Elsen, Esq. is well known nationally and internationally for arbitrating and mediating complex commercial matters and international litigation and as counsel in such cases. Throughout the course of his legal career, he has served as an arbitrator in more than 60 cases, including arbitration hearings of business disputes and as a hearing panel chair in arbitration-type hearings for the Appellate Division, First Department, as well as serving as a JAMS arbitrator and mediator. Mr. Elsen was a founder of and partner in Orans Elsen Lupert & Brown LLP; Mr. Elsen handled and arbitrated virtually every kind of commercial dispute, including contracts, financing disputes, a battle for controlling interest of a large public company, and a variety of cases involving Fortune 500 companies, smaller companies, major law firms, broker-dealers, accounting firms, hedge funds, private equity funds, alternative investments, corporate executives, investment advisers, registered representatives, lawyers, accountants, and other individuals. Mr. Elsen Co-chaired ABA task force on securities arbitration and testified before Congress on securities arbitration. Handled securities lawsuits and investigations by the SEC, U.S. Attorney's office, and other investigative bodies, representing both plaintiffs and defendants, in many jurisdictions, both in the courts and in arbitration. Selected by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York as its representative to testify before both the Senate and House Committees of Congress on the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), a major overhaul of federal securities law. Extensive experience in transnational disputes, as an arbitrator, mediator, and counsel in the U.S. and abroad involving American companies and individuals, and also many foreign companies and individuals, including those in the U.K., Holland, Israel, Lebanon, France, Monaco, Switzerland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, Malaysia, Singapore, Liberia, Nigeria, and Mexico. Served as Adviser on an international law project of the American Law Institute (“Transnational Principles and Rules of Civil Procedure”). Mr. Elsen fluent in German and has appeared in German courts; fluent in French and has appeared in a Swiss arbitration conducted in French; has a working knowledge of Danish, Italian, Spanish, and Russian.
First Optional Protocol to ICCPR
 
16:56
Subject : Human Rights and Duties Paper : P-03. Civil and Political Rights
Views: 424 Vidya-mitra
International Contract Applicable Law
 
07:59
This video talks about what law would be applicable for international contracts
Views: 66 Suzearitz Suhimi
Recognition of Foreign Judgments in the United States (Webinar)
 
01:02:39
Every year, thousands of judgments from foreign courts are brought to U.S. federal and state courts for recognition and enforcement. Thanks to the sharply rising tide of transnational litigation, more and more U.S. and non-U.S. lawyers will face the challenges of successfully obtaining-or opposing-recognition in U.S. courts. Some of these challenges were recently highlighted in Chevron v. Donziger, a New York federal court case that invalidated a multi-billion dollar Ecuadorian judgment. Any lawyer seeking to obtain or oppose recognition in U.S. courts, will benefit from watching this video, which provides a detailed overview of the law of foreign judgment recognition, and addresses the practical considerations at play. Topics covered include: • The three legal frameworks for foreign judgment recognition • Threshold requirements for recognition • Reciprocity principles • Mandatory and discretionary grounds for non-recognition • Special First Amendment issues • Differences in substantive and procedural law among the states • Use of experts in seeking and opposing recognition • Default judgments • State v. federal courts • Recent decisions and trends
Views: 390 CarltonFields PA
LAWSG094: Alternative Dispute Resolution // Dr John Sorabji
 
04:37
The module introduces students to the principles and practice of alternative dispute resolution. It examines the various processes that collectively constitute ADR, for instance, negotiation; mediation; arbitration; collaborative lawyering; early neutral evaluation; summary jury trial and minitrials. It explores the role played by Ombudsman and recent developments in Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). It does so by examining the nature of disputes, the history and theory of dispute resolution and the development of ADR since the 1970s. The module includes practical exercises in mediation to illustrate the nature and limitations of ADR and the skills of the mediator. It provides experience in the value and limitations of adopting a ‘problem-solving’ approach to disputes. Find out more about the module at: http://www.laws.ucl.ac.uk/study/graduate/llm-programme/llm-taught-modules/lawsg094/
Views: 667 UCL LAWS
Trump Executive Order Litigation: Procedural & Constitutional Issues with Professor Suzanna Sherry
 
48:26
Professor Suzanna Sherry, Herman O. Loewenstein Chair in Law, discusses the litigation surrounding the recent immigration and travel ban, focusing on the complex procedural posture and the substantive constitutional claims. Filmed at Vanderbilt Law School on February 23, 2017. Suzanna Sherry's work in the area of constitutional law has earned her national recognition as one of the most well-known scholars in the field. The author of more than 75 books and articles, she also writes extensively on federal courts and federal court procedures. After graduating from law school, Professor Sherry was a clerk for the Honorable John C. Godbold of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Montgomery, Alabama, and then served as an associate with the law firm of Miller Cassidy Larroca & Lewin in Washington, D.C. Follow Vanderbilt Law on Twitter: https://twitter.com/vanderbiltlaw and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vanderbiltlaw/ See all Vanderbilt social media at http://social.vanderbilt.edu.
Perspectives on Islamic Law Reform
 
02:37:17
In recognition of Human Rights Day, a panel of distinguished Islamic scholars discussed Islamic law reform. Speaker Biography: Issam Saliba is a foreign law specialist in the Law Library of Congress. Speaker Biography: Kristen A. Stilt is a professor at Harvard Law School and co-director of the university's Islamic Legal Studies program. Speaker Biography: Intisar A. Rabb is a professor at Harvard Law School and co-director of the university's Islamic Legal Studies program. Speaker Biography: Sherman Jackson is King Faisal Chair of Islamic Thought and Culture at the University of Southern California. For transcript and more information, visit http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=7637
Views: 2476 LibraryOfCongress
ВЫЖИТЬ в мире ГМОфобии
 
01:02:31
Что было бы, если ГМО истерия случилась во вселенной X-men? Если вы хотите помочь проекту: https://goo.gl/pdNC3E Канал: https://www.youtube.com/user/TrashRecord Мой блог: https://www.youtube.com/c/SmashJournal Группа ВК: https://vk.com/trashsmash Ссылки на материалы (В гугл-doc): https://goo.gl/xkevGp
Views: 925080 TrashSmash
Globalization and the law - Justice Antonin Scalia (2009)
 
01:05:22
Globalización y Derecho Interno This video was uploaded for educational purposes only.
The Future of Personal Jurisdiction
 
34:49
Lea Brilmayer
Views: 296 SCLawReview
CLP Speaker Series - Beyond Benchmarking: How Should Law and Corporate Compliance Intersect?
 
31:54
Michele DeStefano Associate Professor of Law University of Miami School of Law Michele DeStefano was a Climenko Fellow and Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School, where she was previously the Associate Research Director of the Program on the Legal Profession. Her primary area of scholarly interest is in the growing intersection between law and business, how this intersection is reshaping the role of both inside and outside counsel, and the consequences of these developments for clients, the profession, and the public. Employing a mix of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, Professor DeStefano's most recent published research investigates the role general counsels play in managing public relations for high profile corporate legal controversies. She is currently researching the changing role of compliance by conducting interviews of general counsels and chief compliance officers of large, publicly traded corporations. Professor DeStefano is spearheading LawWithoutWalls™ a collaborative, part-virtual, academic model that brings together students, faculty, practitioners, and entrepreneurs from around the world to explore innovation in legal education and practice. Students from Miami Law, Fordham Law, Harvard Law, New York Law School, Peking University School of Transnational Law, and University College London Faculty of Laws will be paired up to conduct investigative research on an assigned topic to identify a problem in legal education or practice. Then, over the course of the semester, the pair of students will develop a Project of Worth that will offer creative solutions to the identified issue. Class will be virtual and entail guest presentations by thought leaders and active learning sessions that focus on business and team skills, interview techniques, and idea generation. Students will also be paired up with an academic mentor and a practitioner mentor for a series of virtual conversations, and have access to an entrepreneur advisory board and a subject expert board. Professor DeStefano also teaches courses in professional responsibility, civil procedure, and business associations. For more information, visit http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/plp/
Views: 1118 HLS CLP
Hot Topics: The Globalization of Environmental Law
 
56:18
Tseming Yang, Santa Clara University Law School
Views: 30 Vermont Law School
What is GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW? What does GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW mean?
 
05:11
What is GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW? What does GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW mean? GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW meaning - GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW definition - GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ Global administrative law is an emerging field that is based upon a dual insight: that much of what is usually termed “global governance” can be accurately characterized as administrative action; and that increasingly such action is itself being regulated by administrative law-type principles, rules and mechanisms – in particular those relating to participation, transparency, accountability and review. GAL, then, refers to the structures, procedures and normative standards for regulatory decision-making including transparency, participation, and review, and the rule-governed mechanisms for implementing these standards, that are applicable to formal intergovernmental regulatory bodies; to informal intergovernmental regulatory networks; to regulatory decisions of national governments where these are part of or constrained by an international intergovernmental regime; and to hybrid public-private or private transnational bodies. The focus of this field is not the specific content of substantive rules, but rather the operation of existing or possible principles, procedural rules and reviewing and other mechanisms relating to accountability, transparency, participation, and assurance of legality in global governance. Today almost all human activity is subject to some form of global regulation. Goods and activities that are beyond the effective control of any one State are regulated at the global level. Global regulatory regimes cover a vast array of different subject-areas, including forest preservation, the control of fishing, water regulation, environmental protection, arms control, food safety and standardization, financial and accounting standards, internet governance, pharmaceuticals regulation, intellectual property protection, refugee protection, coffee and cocoa standards, labour standards, antitrust regulation, to name but a very few. This increase in the number and scope of regulatory regimes has been matched by the huge growth of international organizations: nowadays over 2,000 intergovernmental organizations (IGO) and around 40,000 Non-governmental organizations (NGO) are operating worldwide. There are, of course, great differences among the various different types of regulatory regimes. Some merely provide a framework for State action, whereas others establish guidelines addressed to domestic administrative agencies, and others still impact directly upon national civil society actors. Some regulatory regimes create their own implementation mechanisms, while others rely on national or regional authorities for this task. To settle disputes, some regulatory regimes have established judicial (or quasi-judicial) bodies, or refer to those of different regimes; while others resort to “softer” forms, such as negotiation. Within this framework, the traditional mechanisms based on State consent as expressed through treaties or custom are simply no longer capable of accounting for all global activities. A new regulatory space is emerging, distinct from that of inter-State relations, transcending the sphere of influence of both international law and domestic administrative law: this can be defined as the global administrative space. IOs have become much more than instruments of the governments of their Member States; rather, they set their own norms and regulate their field of activity; they generate and follow their own, particular legal proceedings; and they can grant participatory rights to subjects, both public and private, affected by their activities. Ultimately, they have emerged as genuine global public administrations. In other words, the structures, procedures and normative standards for regulatory decision-making applicable to global institutions (including transparency, participation, and review), and the rule-governed mechanisms for implementing these standards are coming to form a specific field of legal theory and practice: that of global administrative law. The main focus of this emerging field is not the particular content of substantive rules generated by global regulatory institutions, but rather the actual or potential application of principles, procedural rules and reviewing and other mechanisms relating to accountability, transparency, participation, and the rule of law in global governance.
Views: 299 The Audiopedia
Gruss Lecture in Talmudic Civil Law: (10/07/2010) Part 2
 
01:11:54
Arye Edrei, professor of law at Tel Aviv University and the Gruss Visiting Professor of Talmudic Civil Law at Penn Law, delivers the second of his two Gruss Lectures.
Views: 320 Penn Law
What is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?
 
10:58
What is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)? This video clip tries to give competent but also entertaining answers to this question. The video is part of series "in a little green bag" at the University of St.Gallen, Switzerland. © University of St.Gallen (HSG), Text by Prof. Thomas Beschorner (http://bit.ly/Beschorner), Production: http://www.zense.ch To watch the second «Little Green Bags» video on the ten myths of entrepreneurship, please go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8gRkJ9cnzo. Learn more online: http://www.presse.unisg.ch Become our friend on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/HSGUniStGallen Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/HSGStGallen
Views: 717347 HSGUniStGallen
L001 Political Science And International Relations Syllabus
 
00:34
Political Science Syllabus for Main Examination PART I Political Theory and Indian Politics 1.Politicaltheory meaning and ap-proaches 2.Theories of the state: Liberal, Neoliberal, Marxist, Pluralist, Post-colonial and feminist. 3.Justice: Conceptions of justice with special reference to Rawl's theory of justice and its communitarian critiques. 4.Equality: Social, political and economic;relationship between equality and freedom; Affirmative action. 5.Rights: Meaning and theories; different kinds of rights; concept of Human Rights. 6.Democracy: Classical and contemporary theories; different models of democracy – representative, participatory and deliberative. 7.Concept of power, hegemony, ideology and legitimacy. 8.Political Ideologies: Liberalism, Socialism, Marxism, Fascism, Gandhism and Feminism. 9.Indian Political Thought: Dharamshastra, Arthashastra and Buddhist traditions ; Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, S r i Aurobindo, M.K. Gandhi, B.R. Ambedkar,M.N. Roy . 10.Western Political Thought :Plato ,Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, John,S. Mill, Marx, Gramsci, Hannah Arendt. Indian Government and politics 1.Indian Nationalism: Political Strategies of India's Freedom struggle : constitutionalism to mass Satyagraha, Non-cooperation, Civil Disobedience ; millitant and revolutionary movements, Peasant and workers' movements. Perspectives on Indian National Movement: Liberal, Socialist and Marxist; Radical humanist and Dalit. 2.Making of the Indian Constitution: Legacies of the British rule; different social and political perspectives. 3.Salient Features of the Indian Constitution: The Preamble, Fundamental Rights and Duties, Directive Principles; Parliamentary System and Amendment Procedures; Judicial Review and Basic Structure doctrine. 4. Principal Organs of the Union Government: Envisaged role and actual working of the Executive, Legislature and Supreme Court. Principal Organs of the State Government: Envisaged role and actual working of the Executive, Legislature and High Courts. 5.Grassroots Democracy: Panchayati Raj and Municipal Government; significance of 73rd and 74th Amendments; Grassroot movements. 6.Statutory Inst i tut ions/Commissions: Election Commission, Comptroller and Auditor General, Finance Commission, Union Public Service Commission, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, National Comission for scheduled Tribes, National Commission for Women; National Human Rights Commission, National Commission for Minorities, National Backward Classes Commission. 7.Federalism: Constitutional provisions; changing nature of centre-state relations; integrationist tendencies and regional aspirations; inter-state disputes. 8.Planning and Economic Development : Nehruvian and Gandhian perspectives; role of planning and public sector; Green Revolution, land reforms and agrarian relations; liberalilzation and economic reforms. 9.Caste, Religion and Ethnicity in Indian Politics. 10.Party System: National and regional political parties, ideological and social bases of parties; patterns of coalition politics; Pressure groups, trends in electoral behaviour; changing socio- economic profile of Legislators. 11.Social Movements: Civil liberties and human rights movements; women's movements; environmentalist movements PART II Comparative Politics and InternationalRelations Comparative Political Analysis and International Politics: 1. Comparative Politics: Nature and major approaches; political economy and political sociology perspectives; limitations of the comparative method. 2.State in comparative perspective: Characteristics and changing nature of the State in capitalist and socialist economies, and, advanced industrial and developing societies. 3. Politics of Representation and Participation: Political parties, pressure groups and social movements in advanced industrial and developing societies. 4. Globalisation: Responses from developed and developing societies. 5. Approaches to the Study of International Relations: Idealist, Realist, Marxist, Functionalist and Systems theory. 6. Key concepts in International Relations: National interest, Security and power; Balance of power and deterrence; Transnational actors and collective security; World capitalist economy and globalisation. 7. Changing International Political Order: Rise of super powers; strategic and ideological Bipolarity, arms race and Cold War; nuclear threat; Non-al igned movement : Aims and achievements; Collapse of the Soviet Union; Unipolarity and American hegemony; relevance of non-alignment in the contemporary world. 8. Evolution of the International Economic System: From Brettonwoods to WTO
Bernstein Lecture 2007 | Joseph Lookofsky, Desperately Seeking Subsidiarity
 
01:03:39
Recorded on November 13, 2007. Full title: Desperately Seeking Subsidiarity: Danish Private Law in Scandinavian, European & Global Context. Series: Herbert L. Bernstein Memorial Lecture in International & Comparative Law 6th. Appearing: Paul Haagen, introductions ; Joseph Lookofsky (Copenhagen University), speaker. Related paper: Joseph Lookofsky, Desperately Seeking Subsidiarity Danish Private Law in the Scandinavian, European, and Global Context, 19 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 161-185 (2008). Available at: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djcil/vol19/iss1/5/
Private International Law (Choice of Law in Tort) Bill- Third Reading - Video 1
 
07:48
2017-11-29 - Private International Law (Choice of Law in Tort) Bill- Third Reading - Video 1 Sarah Dowie Help us caption & translate this video! https://amara.org/v/cwBq/
Views: 76 inthehouseNZ
How states commit to Human Rights Treaties
 
02:49
This video briefly outlines the four-step process required for states to commit to Human Rights Treaties.
Views: 219 Wimble Don
Introduction to Human Rights | Lesson 11: "Economic, Social and Cultural Rights"
 
15:27
This lesson is part of an International Human Rights free online course. You may follow it in Udemy http://www.udemy.com/introduction-to-human-rights/ or in our Youtube channel http://youtube.com/moocchile (If you want a virtual certificate, you should follow the complete course in Udemy) You may find the transcript of this lesson, as well as a glossary and additional material in our Google Drive folder https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B2wfmjSRnra0XzZ1azRNODdXekE Also, you may follow us on: Twitter http://twitter.com/moocchile Facebook http://facebook.com/moocchilecom Google Plus http://plus.google.com/+Moocchilecom Resources used in this video: Images: ILO Logo http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2011/241/1/6/ilo_flag_icon_by_mahesh69a-d48abah.png Franklin D. Roosevelt http://www.nato.int/ebookshop/video/declassified/doc_files/FDR1933.jpg US elections http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2012/11/6/1352245069344/Us-elections-carousel-cro-007.jpg Cao Dai Temple http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HM2-kdS4LYw/UIzgub95jgI/AAAAAAAAHgE/_U9FU7WaqhQ/s1600/Ceremonia-religiosa-Cao-Dai.jpg Going to School, India http://challengesworldwide.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/going-to-school-india.jpg Music: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Concerto for Flute, Harp, and Orchestra in C major, K. 299/297c, Andantino
Views: 8020 MOOC Chile
Conflict of Laws
 
00:16
Biotechnology,Business Entities Child Welfare Law,Chinese Law and Politics Civil Law,Civil Litigation Civil Procedure, Civil Rights Class Actions,Clinical Education Commercial Law,Communications Law Community Development,Comparative Law Complex Litigation, Computer Law Conflict of Laws, Constitutional Law Consumer Protection Law, Contracts Corporate Finance,Corporations Courts,Criminal Code Reform Criminal Law and Procedure,Criminal Sentencing Debtor/Creditor Law,Dispute Resolution Economic Development,Economics Education Law,Elder Law Electronic Commerce, Employment Discrimination Law Employment Law, Energy and Utilities Law Environmental Law, Estate Planning and Probate European Union Law, Evidence Family Law,
Third Party Funding and ISDS
 
01:30:14
A panel discussion from the "Reforming International Investment Law: Opportunities, Challenges, Paradigms" conference at Boston College Law School. This panel was also a public comment session for the ICCA/Queen Mary Task Force on Third Party Funding in International Arbitration. Speakers Chair: Prof. Frank J. Garcia William Park (Co-Chair, ICCA/Queen Mary's 3rd Party Funding Project) Narghis Torres, Esq. (Founder & CEO, LexFinance) Leo Gargne, Fellow, Law & Justice in the Americas Program (Sorbonne) Rachel Thrasher, Research Fellow, Pardee Center, Boston University
Views: 236 BC Law
Professor Jan Blommaert: “Limits to Democracy”
 
49:33
Jan Blommaert, Professor of Linguistic Anthropology at Tilburg University and Visiting Professor in the PhD program in Applied Linguistics at Hellenic American University, meets the Greek public again οn February 27th 2015, with a talk entitled "The Limits to Democracy". The lecture is organized by the Hellenic American College Linguistics Department in cooperation with Hellenic American University (Manchester, NH, USA). Prof. Blommaert has provided us with the following abstract of his talk: This lecture will examine a discursive template that has emerged in the context of austerity politics all over the EU: that of "limited democracy". In this template, democratic procedures and principles are suggested to be subject - inferior - to concerns of a higher order, and two such concerns stand out. One, the economic conjuncture which needs to be turned around by means of more market-less government strategies, in which the democratic system is asked to withdraw from large sets of previously entrenched decision-making powers. Two, and as a corollary of the first one, security: threats to "political stability" are presented as danger for democracy and have to be met with new forms of informal justice and radical policing, jeopardizing (or undercutting) established civil liberties in a democratic society. The "limits to democracy" framework has spawned new social and political movements in the EU - Syriza, Podemos and several others - for whom the "crisis" is less an economic issue than a crisis of the fundamentals of the democratic system. Related links: http://haec.gr/en/aboutus/past-events/jan-blommaert http://haec.gr/en/academics/phd-applied-linguistics
Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
 
01:24:06
Perspectives on the Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Featuring Barbara Mulvaney, Jill Rosenthal, Chiseche Mibenge, and Beth Van Schaack Just months after the ICTR concluded operations in Arusha and 22 years after the Rwandan genocide, scholars and practitioners will reflect on the court’s legacy. Panelists will offer diverse perspectives on the court’s record in providing accountability for genocide and other gross human rights violations, promoting peace and reconciliation in Rwanda, and contributing to a growing body of substantive and procedural international criminal law. Barbara Mulvaney is an International Human Rights Attorney and a former Senior Prosecutor for the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda. She was a Senior Advisor for the Iraqi Inspector General and Bureau of Supreme Audit, and Deputy Director for Constitutional and Legislative Affairs with the United States Department of State. Jill Rosenthal is an Acting Assistant Professor of History at Stanford. Her work focuses on the history of migration, identity, and international aid in the African Great Lakes region, with specific focus on transnational aid to Rwandan refugees in Tanzania as part of a broader project of nation state formation and regulation—one which deeply affected regional narratives of community and belonging. Chiseche Mibenge is the Haas Center for Public Service’s Director for Community Engaged Learning – Human Rights. Her book Sex and International Tribunals: The Erasure of Gender from the War Story was published by Penn Press. She has conducted fieldwork in Rwanda and Sierra Leone and clerked at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Moderated by Beth Van Schaack, a Faculty Fellow with the Handa Center and Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights at Stanford Law School. Van Schaack teaches and writes in the areas of human rights, transitional justice, international criminal law, public international law, international humanitarian law, and civil procedure. This event is co-sponsored by the Center for African Studies.
The Crisis of South African Democracy: The Challenge to Civil Society and Transformative Politics
 
01:31:16
Skip ahead to main speaker at 0:29 Vishwas Satgar is an associate professor in the Department of International Relations at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. He has been a grass roots activist in South Africa for more than 3 decades. He is currently engaged in supporting the Solidarity Economy Movement in township communities, supporting food sovereignty campaigning, climate jobs campaigning and defending popular democracy in South Africa. His academic interests include a focus on African political economy, Empire and Global crisis, Green Global political Economy and Transnational Alternatives. For more events about the global shift to the political right: http://watson.brown.edu/news/explore/2017/globalshift
International Criminal Justice Beyond the ICC: the Extraordinary African Chambers
 
05:59
Interview with Mbacké Fall, Former Prosecutor of the Extraordinary African Chambers in Senegal, by Angela Mudukuti, International Criminal Justice Lawyer, Wayamo Foundation. ENGLISH TRANSLATION BELOW. What were the lessons learnt from the Extraordinary African Chambers, and what where the successes? We have had positive results. The African Chambers had a mandate to try those most responsible for the crimes committed in Chad during the period from 7 June 1982 to 1 December 1990. Habré and five of his closest collaborators were originally supposed to have been prosecuted but co-operation with Chad had its limits: Chad refused to surrender the five co-accused, invoking the principle of non-extradition of nationals. Through cross-checking, witness testimonies, and making thorough use of the Documentation & Security Directorate  (political police) records, we succeeded in gathering enough proof against Hissène Habré, which is why he was the only one to be held accountable by the court. The public prosecution succeeded in obtaining a guilty verdict against Hissène Habré on the counts of crimes against humanity, war crimes and torture. The Court accepted the victims’ claims for reparations and allocated funds for that purpose. The African Chambers have thus honoured their mandate. Does the development of specialised and internationalised courts mean the retreat of the work of the ICC? The ICC bases its work on the principle of complementarity, with the result that national jurisdictions have the prime responsibility for prosecutions and the ICC is a court of last resort. The creation of hybrid tribunals can bring the principle of complementarity into force. For example, if an ICC Member State wishes to adjudicate international crimes but lacks the necessary funds, the country can ask the African Union to create a structure such as the Extraordinary African Chambers. Funding is crucial and thus a major problem for the creation of such structures. International judicial co-operation is also essential, since without the co-operation of the country in which the evidence of the alleged crimes is to be found, funding is futile. What is the importance of victim participation, and how do we gain victims’ trust? In our civil law system victims have their own place in the procedure. Victims participate via civil proceedings, claiming reparations for the damages caused by the accused in the same way as in a public prosecution. When victims become civil parties to the action, they participate in the corroboration of proof and also bring elements of proof against the accused. It is the prosecutor who seeks a “guilty” verdict and a certain sentence. In all other respects, however, these people work alongside the prosecutor. Can we say that the only way to end impunity in Africa is through these specialised courts? This is not the only way to end impunity in Africa. It is primarily the national courts that play this role. But if States do not have the capacity to do so and if the African Union supports them in this task, there is nothing against intermediate structures being created, especially when such structures participate in ending impunity.
UN Forum on Business & Human Rights, Dec 4, 2012 - Keynote Statement by Debbie Stothard
 
09:08
Keynote Statement by Debbie Stothard, Deputy Secretary-General of FIDH and Coordinator of ALTSEAN-Burma at the Opening Session of the 1st UN Forum on Business & Human Rights, Dec 4, 2012, Geneva. High-level segment, chaired by Prof. John Ruggie, Other keynote statements by: Ms. Navanethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mr. Michael H. Posner, Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor of the United States Mr. Stavros Lambrinidis, EU Special Representative for Human Rights Ms. Sandra Polaski, Deputy Director-General for Policy, ILO Mr. Andrei Galaev, Chief Executive Officer of Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Ltd.
Views: 704 Kemayu
Hans Lindahl on "Collective Action and Emergent Global Legal Orders" March 18, 2016
 
01:46:11
Friday, March 18, 2016 Seminar Title: "Collective Action and Emergent Global Legal Orders" Speaker: Hans Lindahl (Tilburg) Venue: "Legal Philosophy between Law and Transnationalism" seminar series, Nathanson Centre, Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto URL: http://nathanson.osgoode.yorku.ca/programs/seminar-series/legal-philosophy-between-state-transnationalism/2015-2016/
Joachim Savelsberg: Legal culture as memorial normativity (The Normative Complex)
 
34:07
Joachim Savelsberg (Minnesota/Bonn): Legal culture as memorial normativity? The concept of legal cultures: Culturalization or formalization? (Chair: Nina Dethloff) In the context of the conference: The normative complex: Legal cultures, validity cultures and normativities 9. & 10. April 2014 | Conference Room 2 in the Rohmühle | Rheinwerkallee 2 | 53227 Bonn -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joachim Savelsberg (Minneapolis/Bonn): Sociologist. Professor at the Department of Sociology of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Fellow at the Käte Hamburger Center for Advanced Study in the Humanities "Law as Culture" Nina Dethloff (Bonn): Legal scholar. Chair for Private Law, Private International Law, Comparative Law and European Private Law, Director of the Institute for German, European and International Family Law at the University of Bonn and Assistant Director of the Käte Hamburger Center for Advanced Study in the Humanities "Law as Culture" Werner Gephart (Bonn): Legal scholar, sociologist and artist. Professor of Sociology at Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, founder and director of the Käte Hamburger Center for Advanced Study in the Humanities "Law as Culture", editor of the volume "Recht" of the Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe (MWG I/22-3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conference: The normative complex: Legal cultures, validity cultures and normativities It is no exaggeration to speak of the rediscovery of the normative dimension of social life. Although for Talcott Parsons, the normative solution of the order problem should at least offer some orientation in the confusing field of social theory, numerous approaches taken by social and cultural sciences did not dwell on this discourse. Likewise, newer culture-theoretical access points also take scant notice of the world of law and normativity. Meanwhile, a need to deal with the basic question of the normative world anew and in novel ways is growing within the traditional disciplines dealing with questions pertaining to the normative-legal shaping of the world, i.e. jurisprudence, legal philosophy, legal theory, and also legal history. The reason that calls for heightened attention to be paid to the "realm of the normative", as Foucault called it, is apparent: Normative weight is shifting from the nation state to transnational spaces of law and validity. Simply put, the reason can be found in processes of globalization. The simultaneous increase in personal orders of validity rekindles culturally shaped minority laws and thereby heightens the potential that encounters of legal cultures do not only end in dialog, but also in conflict. The issue of familiarizing oneself with the world of norms of the other is then not simply a question of moral recognition but a precondition for intercultural communication through the medium of law. Cognitive competencies over legal-cultural idiosyncrasies and differences are therefore not only a matter of import for specialists or for legal training, but also for economic or political actors and further also for successful daily behavior. ... - TBC - more on: http://www.recht-als-kultur.de/en/activities/conferences-and-workshops.2/conference-the-normative-complex-legal-cultures-validity-cultures-and-normativities.107/ ______________________________________________________ www.law-as-culture.com - www.recht-als-kultur.de
Views: 96 Law as Culture
Talks@12: Disparities & Bias in Global Health
 
01:12:55
Lack of cultural humility and understanding of socioeconomic disparities among the medical community may contribute to inequitable health care outcomes. Paul Farmer shares his global experience and discusses whether a social medicine approach can lead to health care justice for all. Talk by: Paul Farmer, MD, PhD Kolokotrones University Professor of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School Chair, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School Chief, Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital Co-founder, Partners in Health Moderated By: Joan Reede, MD, MPH, MS, MBA Dean for Diversity and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Professor, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Assistant in Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital Like Harvard Medical School on Facebook: https://goo.gl/4dwXyZ Follow on Twitter: https://goo.gl/GbrmQM Follow on Instagram: https://goo.gl/s1w4up Follow on LinkedIn: https://goo.gl/04vRgY Website: https://hms.harvard.edu/
Zeitgeist: Moving Forward  #DocumentaryFilms spread
 
02:41:26
Zeitgeist: Moving Forward, by director Peter Joseph, is a feature length documentary work which will present a case for a needed transition out of the current socioeconomic monetary paradigm which governs the entire world society. zeitgeist moving forward, watch zeitgeist moving forward online, zeitgeist 3, moving forward, zeitgeist 3 moving forward, zeitgeist moving forward release date, 3rd zeitgeist film, download zeitgeist moving forward, film, documentary, watch online, zeitgeist information, zeitgeist movies This subject matter will transcend the issues of cultural relativism and traditional ideology and move to relate the core, empirical "life ground" attributes of human and social survival, extrapolating those immutable natural laws into a new sustainable social paradigm called a "Resource-Based Economy". Website: http://www.zeitgeistmovingforward.com http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com http://shortempire.com Release Map: http://zeitgeistmovingforward.com/zmap $5 DVD: http://zeitgeistmovingforward.com/dvd Movement: http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com guru methismacs forward minions money moving petrutek video youtube zeitgeist http://methismacs.blogspot.com it's coffe time Insurance, Loans, Mortgage, Attorney, Credit, Lawyer, Donate, Degree, Hosting, Claim, Christmas, Methismacs http://methismacs.blogspot.it xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Enjoy & stay connected with us! ► Subscribe to T-Series: http://bit.ly/TSeriesYouTube ► Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tseriesmusic ► Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tseries ► Follow us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/InstagramTseries
Views: 779549 MethisMacs
The Roles of Supreme Courts in Constitutional Democracies
 
53:55
The Clough Center hosted this lecture titled "The Roles of Supreme Courts in Constitutional Democracies," with Brazilian Justice Luís Roberto Barroso. Serving in the Brazilian Supreme Court, Justice Barroso earned an LL.M. from Yale Law School and an Ph.D. in Law from the Rio de Janeiro State University's Faculty of Law, where he holds the Constitutional Law Chair.
Analyzing AI Actors
 
39:43
Who would you rather have access to human-level artificial intelligence: the US government, Google, the Chinese government or Baidu? The biggest governments and tech firms are the most likely to develop advanced AI, so understanding their goals, abilities and constraints is a vital part of predicting AI’s trajectory. In this talk from EA Global 2018: San Francisco, Jade Leung explores how we can think about major players in AI, including an informative case study. To learn more about effective altruism, visit http://www.effectivealtruism.org To read a transcript of this talk, visit http://www.effectivealtruism.org/articles/ea-global-2018-analyzing-ai-actors This talk was filmed at EA Global. Find out how to attend here: http://www.eaglobal.org
Populism in Latin America
 
01:25:58
On March 24, Harvard Law School Visiting Professor of Law Helena Alviar García; Alexandra Huneeus, associate professor of law at the University of Wisconsin Law School; and Dinah L. Shelton, Manatt/Ahn Professor of International Law Emeritus at the George Washington University Law School, discussed populism in Latin America, as part of the Human Rights in a Time of Populism conference held at HLS on March 23-24. Yee Htun, clinical instructor in the International Human Rights Clinic, moderated.
Views: 613 Harvard Law School
European civil code
 
12:49
European civil code ☆Video is targeted to blind users Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA image source in video
Views: 105 WikiAudio
Addressing Effects of Populism
 
01:43:04
Addressing the effects of Populism was the focus of a March 24 panel with NYU Law Professor Jeremy Waldron, Professor T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Milano School of International Affairs, Management, and Urban Policy, The New School; and Michael H. Posner, erome Kohlberg Professor of Ethics and Finance and Professor of Business and Society, NYU Stern School of Business. HLS Professor Gerald L. Neuman moderated. Their talk was part of the Human Rights in a Time of Populism conference held at HLS on March 23-24.
Views: 481 Harvard Law School
The History of Harvard Law School: a talk and panel discussion
 
01:15:21
To officially open Harvard Law School’s Bicentennial celebration, a panel of Harvard Law School faculty members gathered on Sept. 5 to discuss the law school’s early history, following a lecture by Visiting Professor Daniel R. Coquillette.
Views: 1222 Harvard Law School
Populism and Human Rights: Lessons Learned?
 
01:03:40
Laurence R. Helfer, Harry R. Chadwick, Sr. Professor of Law at Duke Law School and Gerald L. Neuman, J. Sinclair Armstrong Professor of International, Foreign, and Comparative Law, and director, Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School, discussed populism and Human Rights on March 24. Their talk was part of the Human Rights in a Time of Populism conference held at HLS on March 23-24. Emily Keehn, associate director, Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School moderated.
Views: 533 Harvard Law School
Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy visits HLS
 
01:05:28
On October 22, Anthony Kennedy, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, visited Harvard Law School and sat down for a conversation with Dean Martha Minow.
Views: 34515 Harvard Law School
Yelawolf - Daddy's Lambo (Official Music Video)
 
04:36
Sign up for updates: http://smarturl.it/Yelawolf.News Music video by Yelawolf performing Daddy's Lambo. (C) 2011 DGC Records Best of Yelawolf: https://goo.gl/vy7NZQ Subscribe here: https://goo.gl/ynkVDL #Yelawolf #DaddysLambo #Vevo #HipHop #OfficialMusicVideo
Views: 50643883 YelawolfVEVO
Ben Fulford and David Wilcock on Russian TV: Cabal Defeat is Looming
 
02:22:57
Get Ascension Updates here: http://dwilcock.com 21 million people in Russia and neighboring countries watched REN-TV reveal the imminent defeat of the New World Order in this stunning expose' with Ben Fulford and David Wilcock. This three-hour 8PM documentary revealed how 26 underground bases were mysteriously destroyed between August 22, 2011 and January 2012 -- and explores who may have done it. The Russians explore uncomfortable truths with remarkable new detail and clarity, including the transfer of Nazi scientists to America after World War II under Project Paperclip. Never before has a major television series so thoroughly revealed the international alliance that has formed to encircle and defeat the Cabal. Neil Keenan's epic multi-billion-dollar lawsuit against the United Nations and other Cabal entities is discussed, as well as Fulford's own efforts to organize resistance efforts. Learn how the Federal Reserve deliberately created World War I and II to seize the world's gold -- and create a limitless supply of "bubble money" that could be printed out of thin air. The documentary ultimately stops short of naming BRICS -- Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa -- as the public face of this new alliance against the Federal Reserve. This alliance apparently now encompasses a majority of all countries in the world. The staff of REN-TV told us this show was wildly popular, reaching a stunning 21 million viewers. It is fast-paced and has an intense, dramatic musical score with lots of visuals. You may want to laugh or think this is all "crazy" -- but it was taken seriously enough to be developed into a major, prime-time special on a top Russian network. As David often has said, "if you throw up, you'll feel better" is a good analogy for what we all must learn in order to heal our planet. Without awareness there can be no resolution. On the bottom right of your screen it says CC. You have to click on this to turn on English subtitles or else they will not be visible. Keep in touch with David Wilcock: Sign up for Ascension Updates here: http://dwilcock.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DivineCosmosConvergence YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/davidwilcock333 Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/david_wilcock Sign up for Wisdom Teachings and Cosmic Disclosure with David Wilcock on Gaia: https://www.gaia.com/wilcock Join David on Gaia.com WATCH FREE EPISODES: http://bit.ly/FREECosmicEp01 http://bit.ly/FREECosmicEp02 http://bit.ly/FREECosmicEp05 http://bit.ly/SuperEarthExplained http://bit.ly/FREEPinealGland http://bit.ly/FREEDeepSpaceEp01
Diversity and Social Justice Lectures: Samuel Moyn, "Is Black Lives Matter a Human Rights Movement?"
 
49:11
On Feb. 16, Samuel Moyn, the Jeremiah Smith, Jr. Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, delivered a talk, "Is Black Lives Matter a Human Rights Movement?," as part of the Diversity and Social Justice in First Year Classes Series. The series combines classroom teaching with an eight-part public lecture series examining how issues of diversity and social justice can be integrated into the core 1L classes. The series is co-sponsored by the Dean’s office in collaboration with Professor Mark Tushnet’s seminar.
Views: 1874 Harvard Law School
Snow Tha Product - “Nights" (feat. W. Darling)
 
04:27
Snow Tha Product - “Nights" (feat. W. Darling) Download: http://smarturl.it/DownloadNights Stream: http://smarturl.it/StreamNights Connect with Snow https://twitter.com/SnowThaProduct https://www.facebook.com/SnowThaProduct https://www.instagram.com/snowthaproduct https://soundcloud.com/snowthaproduct http://www.snowthaproduct.com/
Views: 7612124 SNOWTHAPRODUCT
David Lefkowitz on "A State's Right to Territorial Jurisdiction" (Nathanson Seminar, 18 Jan, 2013)
 
01:52:42
Friday, January 18, 2013 - Seminar Title: "A State's Rights to Territorial Jurisdiction" Speaker: David Lefkowitz (Richmond) Respondent: Dan Priel (Osgoode) Venue: Nathanson Centre "Legal Philosophy between Law and Transnationalism" seminar series - Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto URL: http://nathanson.osgoode.yorku.ca/programs/seminar-series/legal-philosophy-between-state-transnationalism/2012-2013/
16. The Great War, Grief, and Memory (Guest Lecture by Bruno Cabanes)
 
45:59
France Since 1871 (HIST 276) The human cost of World War I cannot be understood only in terms of demographics. To better understand the consequences of the war upon both soldiers and civilians it is necessary to consider mourning in its private, as well as its public dimensions. Indeed, for many French people who lived through the war, public spectacles of bereavement, such as the Unknown Soldier, were also conceived of as intensely private affairs. Both types of mourning are associated with a wide variety of rituals and procedures. 00:00 - Chapter 1. Personal and Communal Mourning: Modes of Cultural Grief During and After the Great War 05:39 - Chapter 2. Communities in Mourning: Social Circles of Grief 15:57 - Chapter 3. Specificities of the Great War Experience: The Lost Generation, the Lost Bodies 27:53 - Chapter 4. Rites of Collective Mourning: Creating National Unity through Commemoration Complete course materials are available at the Open Yale Courses website: http://open.yale.edu/courses This course was recorded in Fall 2007.
Views: 16111 YaleCourses
Harold Hongju Koh - Conversations with History
 
55:44
Conversations host Harry Kreisler welcomes Harold Hongju Koh, the new Dean of the Yale Law School and Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law there. They discuss the role of international law, the meaning of the Iran Contra Affair, the impact of 911, and the prospects for peace on the Korean peninsula. Series: "Conversations with History" [3/2004] [Public Affairs] [Humanities] [Show ID: 8382]

Norflex 50 mg imuran
Resumen de hamlet por actos
Generic cymbalta at us pharmacies
Motrin 400mg bd
Risperdal 50 mg