See Uncut footage from these interviews - https://www.patreon.com/redpillinterviews
Make a one time donation: https://www.paypal.me/RedPillInterviews
Download my book Red Pill Galaxy: https://payhip.com/b/wvGe
In today's age, a lot of men are made to feel superficial and shallow because they judge a woman based on her appearance rather than her personality. The Red Pill community claims this is hypocritical because while men might superficially judge a woman as a sex object, woman are just as likely to superficially judge a man as a success object, glossing over his personality and assigning him value based on his wealth and status. Thoughts?
1) Do you think it is ok to judge a man based on his wealth and status?
2) Are you attracted to wealthy, high status men? What about your friends/other women?
3) What is appealing about a high status male with lots of money?
4) Why is women's preference for a successful man not publicly acknowledged and discussed?
5) Why is there so much social stigma for men being superficial for liking a beautiful woman but not for women liking successful men?
6) How would you feel if you were no longer judged by your appearance but your success?
7) Have you thought about how it feels as a man to be judged, not based on your personality but by your success? Can you empathise?
8) Why do you think men don't judge woman based on their wealth and status?
9) Why do women frequently give advice to 'just be yourself' and 'its whats on the inside that counts' instead of advising men to increase their fame, wealth and status?
Such Bull... Wen they say not intrsted in Rich Men lafing my ass of 😂 beniffit 4 them to live of spending other's $$$ & not work 4 it them self's so u gett crusty pus.. & here problem's If u nott Rich Oh and nagging mody ecc u now the tipe of anymal's i ment 😂😂 Reality is this R u pretty u hawe Big 🍆 & How much $$$ u hawe will decide...They say 1 thing in public but in mind somthing lot diffrent
What kind of stupid question is this? Of course a woman is going to look for a successful male. As they should. What do you think, they're going to look for a loser intentionally? To avoid hurting your little feelings? Success is the result of a confluence of positive characteristics. There are exceptions to this rule as there are to all general rules, such as loser men who have inherited money. However in most cases, success means that a man possesses the character traits that yield success. Strong relationship building skills, intelligence, dedication, consistency, determination, forsight and decision making skills all lead to success. Of course a woman will want a man with those traits among others.
A smart woman will pick for herself a successful man because she has to choose not only for herself, but for her future children. She has to make a big decision when picking a man to mate with. Will he provide many long years of service to her and her offspring? Will he impart positive traits and characteristics to her offspring? Will he set a positive example for progeny that will aid them in finding their own success? All of these are very serious questions for a thinking woman; not only for herself, not only for her children but for the future of society at large.
Now don't assume that i'm referring explicitly to monetary success here. There are many kinds of success and all are important. Monetary success can sometimes be misleading and if a woman makes too shallow an inquest into a mans success she may find herself at the mercy of a dangerous personality. A man who sustained some injury at the hands of a city bus and sued, thus becoming wealthy should not be considered successful. A loser man who descended from a wealthy family but does not grow the family's wealth, instead frivolously expending it without return should also not be considered successful. A woman must discriminate carefully between real success and "fake" success.
"Are you attracted to really wealthy men?"
"No" --> [translation] --> "Yes, but that would be admitting to a double standard. Which means, if I admit to it, I can't use it as an excuse when I do exactly what I said I don't do."
Which is more of a legit standard in which to choose a relationship from? Attractiveness or their income? "Attractiveness" shows Hey I am genuinely into you you because I am attracted to you" as apposed to "Income" Hey how much money do you earn per year. Notice all, but two women, in this interview wanted to be judged by their income potential.
A lot of comments below from dudes who've seemingly never known decent women. Kind of sad. My advice to you: get over yourselves, better yourselves, and cultivate the ability to detect nuance.
The signs are always there distinguishing vapid, superficial succubi from serious, good-natured women. The question is: which ones on the continuum are you deserving of?
That,s all they see $$, when it comes to men.All women dream about that wealthy hedgefund manager, ceo, shareholder driving that expensive car and the Armani suit and that great big house on beach front in any warm weather state or country.
That comment from that one woman about not having met any successful men was interesting. It could a part of why these women refuse to claim that they are personally attracted to rich men because they're insecure about not being able to get one. A bit of denial protects them from the self-awareness of their own value. Though there's some hotties here, you'd think they'd get a rich dude
the difference is that there's a whole lot of men out there who aren't very picky and alone. I also think it's a bit of a myth that men have high standards. I think a lot of men appreciate or are able to be attracted to anything remotely feminine in nature
To all the blue pilled "its in their nature" apologists:
It's in my nature to go up to a girl, smack her in the face, and proceed to buttfuck her while screaming "OOGA BOOGA".
Should i do that? Being apologetic of someones action because its "in their nature" is asinine. Why is it that we apply morality to the actions of men but when women do immoral actions "oh its alright its in their nature to seek out wealthy men, be whores and be emotional rollercoasters whilst acting like children." It's just letting them get off easy with behaviours that are childish and not appropriate in a 21st century setting.
A wealthy man who usually has skills,talents and great ideas (which is how he got there) deserves a woman of EQUAL status, of EQUAL intelligence/creativity, and of EQUAL personality/morality.
These girls all have the belief they will some day strike a rich guy and stay with him "just because they have a vagina".
I'm not saying "it is the current year", but when we constantly barrage women with the ideas of western degenerate fashion, kim kardashian type-shows, that money is everything, idiotic mainstream music and that only wealthy men are worth pursuing we create a sort of culture that is anti-male. The blue collared man is not appreciated and seen as vermin.
It is high time we have surpassed the concept of "its natural" as nature sometimes is destructive, research, understanding and development of ideas that fits our current times, as technology and science progresses is NEEDED to keep an equilibrium between the sexes. Feminists have no right to demand that men act as white knights for them whilst providing NOTHING.
There is nothing wrong with being attracted to wealthy high status men
What they mean is that's not all that's important to them . Some women will only care about money just like some men will ONLY care about looks.
However most people want a partner that they find attractive, get on well with and who's not on the dole.
I wouldn't have dated a man who didn't work, most men I think wouldn't want a woman who doesn't work. Obviously once children come that may change.
All of the wine I know chose men for good reasons and vice versa.
These are really cool videos but there are factors like the guy who's interviewing, how he asks the questions, being on camera, thinking about who's watching, what they're wearing ect ect which will all influence their answers in the moment.
Girls and women moisten up and spread 'em for any man they perceive to be wealthy.
If the man is camouflaging his high status smart, sexy, experienced women simply switch
over to assessing his level of confidence.
It's a female skill.
Big pipe rates a close second. (Girth)
A rich guy with a fat cock has to beat them off with a shitty stick.
Ad good manners and a sense of humour and even paired up women will find a half an hour to
slip him a phone number or "as long as she feels safe" give him a quickie
Bet on it
What the hell, why are Asian girls in Australia so ugly?!? Wtf Australian women have the worst accent in the world all nasal and annoying asf. Margot Robbie would sound like shit talking like that thank god she doesn't.
Get paid, get laid... As simple as that... Women are wired to seek resources its just how the fuck it is... Women have no depth at all and they shouldn't. And its great cuz what man would want to go through a 5 hour intellectual exchange before getting laid while flashing the lambo keys does the trick? Just get out there and kick ass and make as much money as you can. Trust me everything will just fall into place.
Just go back to how nature works and it will all makes sense. A successful man is a good potential provider. That's what females are looking for. A Male to provide for their offspring. And PS: Marriage is NOT a natural thing.
It is dependant on the hotness of the girl. Hot girls KNOW they are hot so are always looking for something better because they perceive themselves as being able to acquire it and thus have that thought sub consciously banked. It all backfires when the bum sags, the thigh gap is lost, the bingo wings develop and the tits droop.
I guess if people were sufficiently self aware and honest to declare their motivations at the time ( the present moment ) there would be less resort to litigation in the untangling process. If a woman is a hypergamous bitch just looking to be screwed in the short term by a " fill in " ( no pun intended ) state as much and make an arrangement. Same for guys.
Well that's not proving anything other than the fact that *human beings* judge one another based on superficial factors. This is not a gender exclusive attribute.
*That bias comes from education but also personal achievements* that create or destroy relationships through our lives.
While many do not want to admit it, the reality of the fact is that *people want to climb the social ladder by some kinds of means and this is nature.* An animal with a broken leg would be found less attractive than one being fully fit, able to provide for that family.
No good thinking person would associate themselves with a person that would not pull them to the top. Yes, you have bills to pay and life is not just about partying, sex and music.
However, there's sometimes *a distortion between what is perceived and the reality.* That's where deception comes into place and people's stubbornness to pursue the same path despite experience also happens to be true. But, that's another story.
It happens that some people are less superficial than others. *Everyone has a degree of superficiality.*
*Superficiality does not just include money.* A guy interested in nature and saving the world will superficially underrate a girl who would not be educated in that department. A geek whose life is coding will superficially rate a typical blond girl as idiotic, uneducated or useless.
Certainly, that latter guy would feel more empowered by a girl whose purpose is also parametric equations or mechanical science. It just so happens. *The whole purpose is to mitigate that level of bias in case we don't miss out on great people.*
Ladies...... It's okay to admit you are attracted to resources and wealth. It is part of human evolution and part of your biology to want a man who can provide. Being attracted to a man who cannot provide (resources and money) who go against evolution and would complicate your ability to provide for your children. Just remember when all men know the truth, they will mostly likely believe that you are not worthy of the access to a mans wealth and resources....... And judging by the current game that is rigged against men..... The men are right.
1:36 are you personally attracted to high status men... no, no, no, ??? - talk about blatant lies.. can't admit the truth to us !!! further in the video... you can see they have not even paid any thought at all to how guys feel being judged on their status instead of their personalities...
This is a unique real vampire website for vampires as well as the curious. It has valuable information for any real vampire and is based on scientific evidence. It also leads to other good websites for real vampires.
This is why I "think" Im a real vampire They have no desire to use us as lab rats or slaves. Before reading any farther on this site, This website is not made for poser vamps, close-minded people, or those who think that they are, or claim to be a vampire because they think the spirit of a vampire entered them at some time making them a vampire. We call these people posers, which they are; they are confused lost children. This site is not here for them in any way! It is for real vampires, curious people, and open-minded skeptics. The best compliment that you can give to this site, is telling all of your friends about it.
Real vampires are not pure fiction.
The Headache Paradox: It is scientifically impossible to have a headache, seeing that there are no pain receptors in the brain. Yet we continue to search for answers to what causes a headache, because we all know that headaches do exist.
Between a combination of the fact that our brains are roughly nothing more than a highly advanced mass of nerves, and that every function is controlled by signals that our brain sends through our nerves to the rest of our bodies, I think that if we could somehow make our nerves send stronger, more efficient signals at a quicker speed it would have a lot of different results. Including heightened sense (both physical and psychic) moving quicker both running and walking along with arm movement etc. The brain being just nerves would obviously also be effected, resulting in quicker more efficient thinking, which naturally would make us smarter, more observant, and have much sharper reflexes.
Some say that is an overly simplified form of how the brain functions, which it is. To them I say make the axons 12-15% wider, resulting in signals being sent much more quickly through the brain. Allowing neurons to create more connections without loss of speed, and the 10,000+ miles of blood vessels in the brain doubling as an additional cooling system for the brain. I could write a book on the cascade of effects that alone causes for people when they are changed in to a real vampire, however for now I will leave it in this simplified form.